A headless CMS is a content management system that separates the backend (content repository) from the frontend (presentation layer), allowing content to be delivered across multiple channels and devices. This approach is crucial for businesses aiming to provide digital experiences in various formats, such as web, mobile, voice, and AI-driven personalization. (Source: Original Webpage)
Hygraph is a leading GraphQL-native headless CMS that enables businesses to modernize their content management systems, supporting omnichannel content delivery and integration with modern tech stacks. It addresses the shift from monolithic CMS to flexible, scalable architectures. (Source: Original Webpage, Knowledge Base)
The primary purpose of Hygraph is to enable digital experiences at scale with enterprise features, security, and compliance. It empowers businesses to innovate through modular and composable architectures, supporting content federation and omnichannel delivery. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph is designed for developers, product managers, content creators, and marketing professionals in enterprises, agencies, and businesses across industries such as eCommerce, SaaS, media, healthcare, automotive, and more. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Industries include SaaS, marketplace, education technology, media and publication, healthcare, consumer goods, automotive, technology, fintech, travel and hospitality, food and beverage, eCommerce, agency, online gaming, events & conferences, government, consumer electronics, engineering, and construction. (Source: https://hygraph.com/case-studies)
Notable customers include Samsung, Dr. Oetker, Komax, AutoWeb, BioCentury, Voi, HolidayCheck, and Lindex Group. (Source: https://hygraph.com/case-studies)
Yes. For example, Komax achieved 3x faster time to market, Samsung improved customer engagement by 15%, and AutoWeb saw a 20% increase in website monetization. More case studies are available at Hygraph's case studies page. (Source: Knowledge Base)
The eBook covers the fundamentals of content management, the transition from monolithic to headless CMS, and evaluates whether a headless CMS is relevant for your organization. (Source: Original Webpage)
You can download the eBook by filling out the form with your first name, last name, work email, and company name on the resource page. (Source: Original Webpage)
To access resources like eBooks, you need to provide your contact information (first name, last name, work email, company name) and consent to communications from Hygraph. (Source: Original Webpage)
Hygraph offers a GraphQL-native architecture, content federation, enterprise-grade security and compliance, Smart Edge Cache, localization, granular permissions, and an intuitive interface for non-technical users. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Yes, Hygraph integrates with platforms such as Aprimo, AWS S3, Bynder, Cloudinary, Imgix, Mux, Netlify, Vercel, Akeneo, BigCommerce, EasyTranslate, and more. See the full list at Hygraph's Marketplace. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph provides several APIs, including the Content API, High Performance Content API, MCP Server API, Asset Upload API, and Management API. Each supports different aspects of content management and integration. (Source: https://hygraph.com/docs/api-reference)
Hygraph offers comprehensive technical documentation, including API references, schema components, webhooks, getting started guides, advanced caching, and classic docs for legacy users. (Source: https://hygraph.com/docs)
Hygraph offers high-performance GraphQL API endpoints, a read-only cache endpoint with 3-5x latency improvement, and performance monitoring to ensure low latency and high throughput. (Source: https://hygraph.com/graphql-survey-2024, https://hygraph.com/blog/improvements-to-high-performance-endpoint)
Hygraph's headless architecture and content federation enable businesses to deliver content consistently across web, mobile, voice, and other digital channels. (Source: Original Webpage, Knowledge Base)
Hygraph supports localization and integrates with translation platforms like EasyTranslate, making it suitable for global teams managing multilingual content. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph integrates with leading DAM solutions such as Aprimo, AWS S3, Bynder, Cloudinary, Imgix, and Scaleflex Filerobot, enabling efficient management of digital assets. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph addresses operational inefficiencies, high costs, slow speed-to-market, technical integration challenges, content inconsistency, and localization issues. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph enables companies to transition from legacy systems to modern, scalable, and flexible content management architectures, supporting omnichannel delivery and integration with modern tools. (Source: Original Webpage, Knowledge Base)
Customers can expect improved operational efficiency, reduced costs, faster time-to-market, technical advancements, scalability, and proven ROI, as demonstrated in case studies like Komax and Samsung. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph provides an intuitive UI, eliminates developer dependency, and offers tools for localization, personalization, and workflow management, empowering content creators and marketers to work independently. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph's content federation and localization features ensure consistent content delivery across regions and channels, addressing the needs of global marketing teams. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Customers praise Hygraph for its intuitive interface, ease of setup, and user-friendly tools for non-technical users. Some users note it can be complex for less technical users, but overall feedback is highly positive. (Source: Knowledge Base)
By replacing traditional CMS solutions with a scalable, modern platform, Hygraph reduces operational and maintenance costs, as demonstrated in customer case studies. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph enables faster project launches by simplifying content creation and management. For example, Top Villas launched a new project in just 2 months using Hygraph. (Source: https://hygraph.com/case-studies/top-villas-case-study#why-hygraph)
Hygraph is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant (since August 3rd, 2022), ISO 27001 certified, and GDPR compliant, ensuring high standards for information security and data privacy. (Source: https://hygraph.com/features/secure)
Hygraph encrypts all connections to its web application and customer data both in transit and at rest. It also offers granular permissions, audit logs, dedicated hosting, and permanent auth tokens for secure content management. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Yes, Hygraph is GDPR compliant and adheres to CCPA and other regulatory requirements to ensure data privacy and protection. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph offers granular permissions, audit logs, dedicated hosting, custom SLAs, security certifications, and continuous monitoring by Drata for compliance. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Implementation can be quick; for example, Top Villas launched a new project in just 2 months, and Si Vale met aggressive deadlines with a smooth implementation. (Source: https://hygraph.com/case-studies/top-villas-case-study#why-hygraph)
Getting started is easy: sign up for a free account, access onboarding resources, and use starter projects and comprehensive documentation. Community support is available via Slack. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph provides getting started guides, technical documentation, onboarding calls, and a Slack community for support. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Yes, Hygraph offers pre-configured starter projects with existing schemas and models to help users jumpstart their development. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Unlike traditional CMS platforms that rely on REST APIs and monolithic architectures, Hygraph is GraphQL-native, supports content federation, and enables omnichannel delivery, making it more flexible and scalable for modern needs. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Hygraph is the first GraphQL-native headless CMS, offers content federation, enterprise-grade features, and is recognized for ease of implementation, ranking 2nd out of 102 headless CMSs in the G2 Summer 2025 report. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Customers choose Hygraph for its GraphQL-native architecture, content federation, enterprise-grade features, user-friendly tools, scalability, and proven ROI, as demonstrated in customer case studies. (Source: Knowledge Base)
Developers benefit from GraphQL-native APIs and schema evolution; content creators enjoy an intuitive UI; enterprises gain robust security and scalability; agencies can efficiently manage multiple client projects. (Source: Knowledge Base)
This page wast last updated on 12/12/2025 .
Why companies are ditching their legacy systems for modern architecture
Last updated by Omer & Alex
on Jan 21, 2026Originally written by Omer & Alex
Having a mobile-friendly website or an optimized landing page is no longer sufficient. The world is shifting towards embracing composability to support the Age of Technology, where consumers are spoiled for choice when consuming content on multiple platforms simultaneously.
The future-proofness and extensibility of companies´ software platforms are keeping CTOs awake at night. As the need for delivering digital experiences in multiple formats increases by the day, businesses are becoming more conscious about voice search and AI-driven content personalization: phrases that didn´t even exist in the mainstream until recently.
As we gear towards being able to provide these experiences across these new formats and prepare ourselves for content in the omnichannel world, we need to understand how the role of a CMS in delivering these experiences has fundamentally changed from Web 1.0 and the maintenance of static content.
In this eBook, we´ll cover the fundamentals of content management, the global transition from a monolithic CMS to a headless CMS, and whether a headless CMS is relevant for your organization.
A wide array of economic, social, and technological changes have re-defined organizations´ needs for content management solutions over the last 10 years.
Moore´s law led to a processor performance improvement of 5x in the last decade. Smartphones, rare peculiarities before the iPhone´s arrival in 2007, are virtually in every pocket now. It is estimated that the total number of smartphone users globally is at 5.25 billion in 2023, which is a 4.9% increase from the past year. IoT devices and voice assistants are also flooding our homes, workplaces, and cities. According to G2, there are currently over 31 billion IoT devices worldwide.
Software companies like Amazon, Netflix, Google, and Meta have rewritten the laws of their industries by changing consumer expectations about what is possible with a web-based application. A user distrusts any piece of software that does not follow the beautiful Ul and UX rules set by the aforementioned organizations. A website built in 2015 could still give you a "90´s" feeling.
Process by process, industry by industry – digitization is now not simply about having your corporate leaflet as a website anymore. You cannot simply be “present” online; you must be active, different, and personalized. You need to have a purpose. You do not simply have a website with text and images; you have an application processing data and content to serve multiple needs of multiple user segments.
Digital transformation has become more important than ever for organizations to stay competitive and keep up with the constantly changing customer demands in today’s technological landscape. Over 91% of organizations are already engaged in some form of digital initiatives, and more than half of CEOs believe that their digital initiatives have increased revenue for their respective organizations.
The insatiable hunger for developers has resulted in a race to optimize. To compete - but mostly to survive - organizations go agile, improve team structures, outsource processes that are not their core capabilities, seek technologies that are nicer to work with, and choose technologies that are flexible and will not be obsolete in 2 years.
The pressure to replace old systems is rising, driven by developers' lack of desire to work with old technologies and frameworks. As business leaders want more out of IT than ever, IT investments have increased to $11.7 million on average. 78% of enterprises expect IT budgets and headcount to increase over the next year. As a direct result, IT teams can deliver more projects on time. Over 48% of them stated that they completed every project that was asked of them, an increase of 44% from the past year.
Combining all these factors leads to the emergence of a myriad of web-based API-first technologies, making developers´ lives easier, satisfying the needs of an unappeasable consumer, opening new revenue channels, or decreasing the total cost of software ownership for organizations.
The trend toward API-first content management solutions is easily understandable since software systems must be treated as complex organizations. By breaking down monolithic software systems into manageable specialized microservices, each unit can provide greater performance and skill.
Microservice Architecture is the practice of designing software as modules of independently deployable services. Modularity, independence, decentralization of programming languages and data, automated deployment, and agile small teams working on separate groups of features independently are some of the core traits of microservices.
James Lewis and Martin Fowler from ThoughtWorks offer a definition of the concept: “In short, the microservice architectural style is an approach to developing a single application as a suite of small services, each running in its own process and communicating with lightweight mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. These services are built around business capabilities and are independently deployable by fully automated deployment machinery. There is a bare minimum of centralized management of these services, which may be written in different programming languages and use different data storage technologies."
In contrast, monolithic applications are built as a single unit. It consists of the client-side user interface, a database, and a server-side application, which "handle(s) HTTP requests, execute domain logic, retrieve and update data from the database, and select and populate HTML views to be sent to the browser" (Lewis, Fowler). This server-side application is a single logical executable. Changes to the monolith would require rebuilding and re-deploying an entirely new application version.
To summarize, monolith systems are often too rigid, architecturally complex, and not created according to accepted standards. The pool of talent who can operate them is limited and expensive. Onboarding even the most seasoned developer takes months. Small changes to monolithic systems require significant time and effort, typically involving tremendous risk.
In the legacy architecture, there were several different systems in place, and each system was built for a specific purpose in a relatively monolithic approach. You can't consolidate a stack if every system has its own silo and its own setup. We want to have a target architecture where we really have a more modular setup, and also we can evolve over time. And that's why we chose to have an API-first approach, to have headless systems and combine them into one user experience.
Expensive software monolith disasters often appeared in technology news headlines since the turn of the century.
In 2000, while Michael Jordan was still holding on to his legendary NBA career, Nike combined their ERP, supply chain, and CRM systems into one giant system. They wanted to forecast the demand for their products better (incl. the best-selling Air Jordans). However, a software glitch, according to their VP of Global Operations and Technology, Roland Wolfram, cost the company a $100 million in sales loss and a 20% stock price decrease. A massive number of Air Jordans simply didn’t make it to the stores. The project took twice as long to complete and cost an additional $100 million more than planned.
Other recent monolith-system-related debacles include Lidl’s canceled $500 million dollar inventory management project in 2018. Both Best Buy and Groupon barely avoided disaster by shifting to a more decoupled system architecture. Best Buy had a monolithic, interwoven Oracle database at its core, hindering the deployment of fixes and features -- a tough spot to be in with competitors like Amazon and Walmart. Groupon’s frontend codebase was difficult to maintain, page loading times were slow, and new features took ages to deploy.
In contrast, companies like Netflix based their phenomenal growth on smart microservice architectures. In 2009, Netflix struggled to achieve sufficient availability and speed for its streaming services. Scaling to the massive number of subscribers it has now (ca. 150m in April 2019) was simply not imaginable. By moving to a cloud-based headless architecture, Netflix could build data centers in minutes and keep up with its user growth rate. Moreover, the new approach allowed the company to create a few dozen independent developer teams that could work on different sets of microservices within different timelines. The productivity and flexibility of development were massively increased.
The overall trend is that over 80% of organizations that currently do not have a headless architecture plan to do so in the next two years. And for a very good reason – 77% of organizations that use a headless architecture state that it gives them improved agility, allowing them to make changes quickly.
The universe of content management has been dominated by massive .NET, Java, Perl, and PHP-based systems since the dot-com bubble. Open-source heavyweights WordPress, Joomla, and Drupal have democratized the creation of simpler websites, making them accessible to non-tech users.
Traditional content management systems are monoliths focused on a web-first platform and attempting to back-fill support for emerging technology like smartphones and televisions - in short, they are rigid and inflexible. Adapting them for modern digital content channels, such as mobile, IoT, or AR, is impossible or requires significant effort. Even small technical changes lead to long implementation times.
Yet, terms like "monolith", "headless", and "microservices" are merely concepts until you fit them into a specific use case. When so many monolith solutions claim to be "composable", you'll eventually realize they're "MACH monoliths". Though monolithic architecture is widely used in enterprises, the only way to go is to rethink and iterate solutions around what you really need.
A software glitch cost Nike $100 million in sales loss and a 20% stock price decrease
The engineers at Amazon Prime Video reported earlier this year that they had changed the architecture of their QoS (quality-of-service) monitor from microservices to a monolithic architecture, only to be found later by experts that the solution Prime Video adopted failed to meet the requirements of a monolithic application. In every respect that truly matters, including scalability and functionality, it is a more developed microservice than what Prime Video had before.
Perhaps the answer lies in what AWS’ Ajay Nair said: “Building an evolvable architectural software system is a strategy, not a religion.” After all, it's not enough to just adopt a solution because its term is trending. It's important to see if your current solution, whether that's the traditional monolithic, is holding you back, and here are some top signs to look out for:
Monolithic CMSs are often built on a rigid architecture, making it challenging to adapt to changing business needs and emerging technologies.
The tightly integrated nature of monolithic CMSs poses security risks, as a single vulnerability can compromise the entire system.
The rigid architecture and complex development processes of monolithic CMSs can lead to longer development cycles, resulting in slower time-to-market for new content and features.
As businesses grow and their content requirements expand, monolithic CMSs may struggle to handle the increasing workload efficiently.
Monolithic CMSs can be less SEO-friendly due to their restricted customization options, impacting search engine rankings and visibility.
Monolithic CMSs may require extensive resources and ongoing maintenance to keep the system up-to-date and secure. The costs associated with maintaining and upgrading the platform can strain an organization's budget and divert resources from other critical business initiatives.
Separating the frontend and backend of a content management system is the natural evolution of many of the monolith-related issues in this software category. Leave the CMS without a head and let the content be delivered to any modern stack via talkative APIs (e.g., GraphQL APIs), providing access to a powerful backend.
To elaborate, a headless CMS is, at its core, a content repository that makes content accessible via an API to any platform. The term "headless" comes from the concept of detaching the "Head," i.e., the frontend (Website, App, etc.), from the "body," i.e., the backend (content repository, database, etc.). Instead of delivering compiled HTML, a headless CMS only delivers the content by means of an API. An API-driven approach offers many advantages over traditional CMS paradigms.
By removing the presentation layer from the CMS, there are theoretically no restrictions to how and where content can be delivered. Marketing and editorial teams can create content within the editor interface of a headless CMS (similar to how they would with WordPress or Joomla) should there be one, and the engineering team can define how and where this content is delivered.
The headless approach to content management allows teams to publish content faster and iterate their digital presence more efficiently.
An API driven approach offers many advantages over traditional CMSs paradigms.
Bring content to any platform (native apps, VR, IoT, etc). You aren't restricted to just publishing content to a single website or mobile app. A headless CMS like Hygraph allows you to develop with any technology for any platform, making your product scalable when your users need you to be.
Working with clearly defined data lets your development team know where to pick up instantly. Hygraph content infrastructure clearly defines the operations (queries and mutations) supported by the API.
A headless CMS allows for your content to be modified immediately and as needed by your content creators. Minimize the impact of redesigns, product changes, and migrations with a decoupled content solution. Additionally, you don't need to worry that a headless CMS won't be able to deliver content to another digital channel that emerges five years from now.
With one point of connection, your headless CMS allows for only one access point of vulnerability. Hygraph offers many robust features for protecting your endpoint, including permanent auth tokens, DDOS mitigation strategies, and more.
You want to hire the most talented developers possible. There is no need to teach a prehistoric web template language just to manage your content. Instead, work with any modern language stack your team pleases.
It's counterintuitive to copy, paste & recreate content for your app across different platforms. Consolidating your content within one API minimizes overhead costs, time, and development resources.
By dividing the frontend presentation layer from the backend content administration and authoring layer, companies like Samsung, Dr. Oetker, and Booking have conquered many modern channels like web, mobile, and IoT. Frontend development teams no longer need to know the obscure secrets of a complex backend system.
Enterprises have widely adopted headless CMS for providing a seamless and omnichannel digital experience for customers. In the State of Commerce Report by Salesforce, 76% of companies state that headless CMS offers more flexibility in customizing digital experiences.
You want the customizability of an in-house CMS but not the associated costs and risks? A headless CMS can bring you close to this dream.
In theory, building your own CMS assures full customizability to your specific use case. In practice, a custom system is more likely to be a patchwork of compromises. It will result from internal struggles of prioritizing features, leaving everyone dissatisfied. It will fit your process at a specific time, but any later changes will require a rewrite of large parts of your codebase.
An un-opinionated headless solution like Hygraph fits the widest range of Content Modelling and API design needs. Frontend and backend are decoupled, so you can define and build all customer-facing features. Furthermore, features like UI Extensions and Custom Roles with granular access permissions enable you to adapt the CMS to even the most complex editorial processes.
You can set up an entire website in less than an hour with some headless commercial solutions including content architecture and API design and hooking up with your chosen frontend. Building an in-house system will set you back months, maybe years, of designing, building, and debugging.
Recommended reading
The total costs of an in-house CMS consist of large upfront and continuous ongoing maintenance costs. Upfront costs, measured in developer time, will set you back 18-48 developer months for the most basic CMS. Ongoing maintenance costs include hosting, a CDN, an authentication layer, developer tools, and some dedicated developer time for monitoring and bug fixing.
Headless CMS monthly costs start at free. Even the most demanding enterprise companies won’t spend more than a few thousand dollars for the highest service levels.
Switching costs to a new vendor are also significantly lower, thanks to the modular nature of a headless system. A native headless CMS, like Hygraph, is "unopinionated," allowing you to build your content infrastructure in a lego-building-blocks-like way. If you ever decide to move, you won´t need to build both your frontend and backend from scratch.
In best case scenario, an in-house solution will fulfill your requirements as long as those requirements do not change. If you never change your processes and never adopt new technology (e.g., smartphones or whatever comes next), this is okay. Probably, you will need to adapt to stay in business. So, you must adapt and expand your system in no later than 1-2 years. Once again, a new project team to brainstorm, innovate, build, test, deploy, and bug-fix.
A headless CMS company´s bread and butter is innovating. Upgrades will come regularly and at a much lower cost. Selecting a young company with a growth mindset means constantly exploring exciting new features for at least the next 5-7 years.
A complex solution like a headless CMS consists of multiple sub-systems that must coordinate perfectly. Many of these you don´t want to take care of yourself: server set-up, security layer, authentication layer, digital asset management, CDN setup.
Other subsystems need to be built by engineers with hard-to-find expertise: content model APIs, GraphQL server setup, workflow design, user role design, etc.
When choosing a headless CMS, organizations often find themselves at a crossroads, choosing between cloud-based CMS and on-premise CMS. It underscores the ongoing debate about CMS' efficiency, scalability, security, and cost-effectiveness.
A cloud-based CMS (or a cloud CMS), is a pre-built content management system hosted entirely on the cloud and can be accessed online by users without needing to install, update, or maintain any software on-premise.
It is typically licensed via subscription, and the cloud CMS provider offers constant software updates without disruptions. This allows organizations to focus on leveraging the many benefits of the CMS instead of drowning time and effort into managing and maintaining the CMS.
On-premises CMS is installed and run on an individual's computer or the organization’s server. When using an on-premise CMS, you are entirely responsible for managing the infrastructure needed to run the CMS.
On-premises solutions require installing new versions on the individual hardware to access the updated software, meaning that updates are usually bundled into bigger versions.
Now let’s get into the details and look at how cloud CMS and on-premise CMS are different with a side-by-side comparison:
| Category | Cloud CMS | On-premise CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Since cloud CMS is hosted on the cloud, it is immensely fast for publishing or editing content. Content editors save time as they don’t need to worry about how content appears on different platforms. Reusable components improve efficiency. | The speed of traditional CMS can be limited by on-premise infrastructure, available bandwidth, and existing hardware capabilities. |
| Collaboration | Enables real-time collaboration. Teams can edit, post, and iterate content seamlessly from anywhere and on any device. | Collaboration is limited to company intranet or approved devices, which can slow down workflows and delay content production. |
| Cost efficiency | Low upfront costs. Typically requires only subscription fees to get started. | Higher upfront costs for infrastructure, deployment, and maintenance. Ongoing IT resource costs must also be considered. |
| Scalability | Easily scalable up or down based on demand. Pay only for what you use. | Scaling requires additional servers, infrastructure, and manpower. Scaling down is difficult and less cost-effective. |
| Development time | Faster time to market. Often low-code, reducing IT dependency and allowing content teams to work independently. | Heavily dependent on in-house IT teams and coordination with content teams, which can slow development and delay time to market. |
While cloud-based CMS solutions offer many advantages, the choice between cloud and on-premise CMS should still consider factors like your organization's specific needs, security requirements, compliance considerations, and budget constraints. The decision often comes down to finding the right balance between convenience, flexibility, and control for your particular use case.
Nevertheless, a cloud-based CMS has the following advantages:
Scalability: Cloud-based CMS solutions can easily scale to accommodate increased traffic and content demands without significant hardware or infrastructure investments.
Cost-efficiency: With a cloud CMS, you can avoid the upfront costs of purchasing and maintaining on-premise hardware and software. Instead, you pay for what you use on a subscription basis, potentially reducing costs in the long run.
Accessibility: Cloud CMS platforms are accessible from anywhere with an internet connection, making it easier for distributed teams to collaborate and manage content.
Automatic updates: Cloud-based CMS providers typically handle software updates and maintenance, ensuring your system is always updated with the latest features and security patches.
Reliability: Cloud providers often offer high levels of redundancy and uptime, reducing the risk of downtime due to hardware failures.
Security: Reputable cloud providers invest heavily in security measures, often providing advanced security features that would be expensive and complex to implement in an on-premise environment.
Flexibility: Cloud-based CMS platforms often offer a range of integrations and APIs, making it easier to connect with other tools and services your organization uses.
Disaster recovery: Cloud providers typically have robust disaster recovery and backup solutions in place, reducing the risk of data loss.
Global reach: Cloud solutions can easily serve a global audience, ensuring fast and reliable access to your content for users worldwide.
Focus on core competencies: By offloading infrastructure management and maintenance to the cloud provider, your IT teams can focus on more strategic tasks and innovations rather than routine maintenance.
Despite the uprising popularity of headless systems, challenges exist, like developing and scaling headless systems with custom middleware. Composability and federation are two concepts widely discussed in the CMS space in recent years. We will examine the challenges that come with the rise of headless CMS. We will also examine what composability and federation mean for your business and whether they are necessary for you in this section.
The advent of headless CMS meant a crucial shift from traditional CMS models, allowing frontend developers a great degree of freedom in how they choose to present content. While this was a revolutionary development, it was becoming apparent that the frontend agnostic simply wasn't enough anymore.
Multiple headless CMS solutions tried to solve this problem by proactively pulling all the data in the CMS and calling it the Content Hub. You can, of course, push data to a CMS platform acting as the content repository, but you will always have to maintain the data syncing in between, and you will always run into data integrity problems as you begin to scale.
Once you work with millions of content items or several thousand items, maintaining this data synchronization becomes a real innovation bottleneck. Organizations should focus on delivering new capabilities to solve business challenges rather than losing time solving data integrity problems.
With the advent of composable architecture, businesses relying solely on headless systems might find themselves unable to efficiently customize their infrastructure, allocate resources dynamically, or scale effectively to meet fluctuating demands. In essence, a headless CMS can restrain adaptability and hinder an organization's ability to seize the full spectrum of benefits that a more modular, composable approach offers.
Gartner coined the term composable business in 2020 to describe the trend of companies moving away from traditional architectures, where technology is locked into one way of doing things, and towards a modular structure that lets businesses change and replace technologies and services as needed.
The idea quickly gained traction. Both are among technology leaders, with Gartner predicting that 70% of large and medium organizations will have composability as a key criterion for their new application planning by 2024. As well as among solution vendors, with Gartner predicting that the top 20 cloud platforms and software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers will offer composable component marketplaces by 2026.
The key principles of composable architecture include:
Discoverability: Team members should be able to easily identify and access components and any relevant documentation on how to use them.
Modularity: Each component should have a clear business identity. They should also be small enough to promote agility but large enough to operate independently.
Orchestration: Components should be able to interact with each other so that organizations can effectively build what is needed to support the business.
Autonomy: Each component should be self-contained so that it isn’t dependent on other parts of the system, thus making each easily changeable.
Composable architecture represents a natural progression from headless systems, aiming to address the growing demand for flexibility, scalability, resource optimization, and adaptability in a technology landscape characterized by dynamic workloads and ever-evolving applications. Composability is about breaking down IT infrastructure into smaller, interchangeable parts, providing organizations with a more agile and efficient way to manage and allocate resources. It offers a new level of granularity, control, and customization compared to the more predefined nature of headless architecture.
Regarding the CMS, the primary distinction between a headless CMS capable of supporting a composable architecture and one that cannot lies in its architectural flexibility and integration capabilities.
A headless CMS with composable support is designed with a modular, flexible structure, well-documented APIs, dynamic resource allocation, and customizable technology stacks, enabling organizations to create tailored, adaptable infrastructures seamlessly integrating diverse services and applications. In contrast, a headless CMS lacking composable support may have a more rigid, monolithic structure with limited customization options, restricted API functionality, and less efficient resource allocation, making it less suitable for organizations seeking a highly adaptable and scalable infrastructure.
Recommended reading
We at Hygraph firmly believe that Content Federation further unlocks content composability. Content Federation is the ability to bring data together from multiple sources and backends via API into a single repository without migrating the content or having multiple versions.
Content Federation allows businesses to pull data together from multiple sources and backends via API into a single repository. This can be done without migrating the content or having multiple versions.
Content federation provides access to up-to-date data across multiple systems. That data is then aggregated via a single API that serves as the source of truth and delivers the data to one or more frontends. Changes made to external data sources are updated and reflected in other systems. As a result, data integrity can be preserved and the most current information is always available.
Content Federation brings all your services together from a single GraphQL API, managed out of Hygraph. You can connect various data sources, such as headless e-commerce, PIM, or CRM systems, and join information across systems with a single API call to speed up your development process.
Recommended reading
Hygraph is the next-generation content management platform designed for the era of composable architecture. Hygraph makes it easy for businesses to orchestrate content across unlimited use cases, backend data sources, and frontend channels by providing:
Modern architecture: Leverage the flexibility of a natively headless SaaS platform that exposes all content and functionality via a powerful GraphQL API.
Content Federation: Join data from multiple sources using a single GraphQL API. Data lives in the original source, with Hygraph acting as an API gateway to provide access to always up-to-date information in one central place.
Flexible content modeling: Structure content to fit exact business needs. An intuitive Schema Builder makes it easy to create models, set fields, and define relationships between models.
Rich editing experience: Turn composable content into engaging experiences with an intuitive user interface that provides versioning, preview, digital asset management, and more.
Friction-free collaboration: Unlock the operational efficiency of your team with flexible workflows, roles & permissions, and localization capabilities for global business.
Hygraph is the first GraphQL-native Headless Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to rapidly build and deliver tomorrow’s multi-channel digital experiences at scale.
It was designed for removing traditional content management pain points by using the power of GraphQL, and take the idea of a Headless CMS to the next level. Hygraph integrates with any frontend technology, such as React, Vue and Svelte.
Get started with Hygraph by creating a free account, learn how our customers are solving real-world problems, gather information about next-generation CMS from our resources or academy, or learn more about the applications of Hygraph.
To discuss how Hygraph can help you transform your digital projects, reach out to us.
Why companies are ditching their legacy systems for modern architecture
Last updated by Omer & Alex
on Jan 21, 2026Originally written by Omer & Alex
Having a mobile-friendly website or an optimized landing page is no longer sufficient. The world is shifting towards embracing composability to support the Age of Technology, where consumers are spoiled for choice when consuming content on multiple platforms simultaneously.
The future-proofness and extensibility of companies´ software platforms are keeping CTOs awake at night. As the need for delivering digital experiences in multiple formats increases by the day, businesses are becoming more conscious about voice search and AI-driven content personalization: phrases that didn´t even exist in the mainstream until recently.
As we gear towards being able to provide these experiences across these new formats and prepare ourselves for content in the omnichannel world, we need to understand how the role of a CMS in delivering these experiences has fundamentally changed from Web 1.0 and the maintenance of static content.
In this eBook, we´ll cover the fundamentals of content management, the global transition from a monolithic CMS to a headless CMS, and whether a headless CMS is relevant for your organization.
A wide array of economic, social, and technological changes have re-defined organizations´ needs for content management solutions over the last 10 years.
Moore´s law led to a processor performance improvement of 5x in the last decade. Smartphones, rare peculiarities before the iPhone´s arrival in 2007, are virtually in every pocket now. It is estimated that the total number of smartphone users globally is at 5.25 billion in 2023, which is a 4.9% increase from the past year. IoT devices and voice assistants are also flooding our homes, workplaces, and cities. According to G2, there are currently over 31 billion IoT devices worldwide.
Software companies like Amazon, Netflix, Google, and Meta have rewritten the laws of their industries by changing consumer expectations about what is possible with a web-based application. A user distrusts any piece of software that does not follow the beautiful Ul and UX rules set by the aforementioned organizations. A website built in 2015 could still give you a "90´s" feeling.
Process by process, industry by industry – digitization is now not simply about having your corporate leaflet as a website anymore. You cannot simply be “present” online; you must be active, different, and personalized. You need to have a purpose. You do not simply have a website with text and images; you have an application processing data and content to serve multiple needs of multiple user segments.
Digital transformation has become more important than ever for organizations to stay competitive and keep up with the constantly changing customer demands in today’s technological landscape. Over 91% of organizations are already engaged in some form of digital initiatives, and more than half of CEOs believe that their digital initiatives have increased revenue for their respective organizations.
The insatiable hunger for developers has resulted in a race to optimize. To compete - but mostly to survive - organizations go agile, improve team structures, outsource processes that are not their core capabilities, seek technologies that are nicer to work with, and choose technologies that are flexible and will not be obsolete in 2 years.
The pressure to replace old systems is rising, driven by developers' lack of desire to work with old technologies and frameworks. As business leaders want more out of IT than ever, IT investments have increased to $11.7 million on average. 78% of enterprises expect IT budgets and headcount to increase over the next year. As a direct result, IT teams can deliver more projects on time. Over 48% of them stated that they completed every project that was asked of them, an increase of 44% from the past year.
Combining all these factors leads to the emergence of a myriad of web-based API-first technologies, making developers´ lives easier, satisfying the needs of an unappeasable consumer, opening new revenue channels, or decreasing the total cost of software ownership for organizations.
The trend toward API-first content management solutions is easily understandable since software systems must be treated as complex organizations. By breaking down monolithic software systems into manageable specialized microservices, each unit can provide greater performance and skill.
Microservice Architecture is the practice of designing software as modules of independently deployable services. Modularity, independence, decentralization of programming languages and data, automated deployment, and agile small teams working on separate groups of features independently are some of the core traits of microservices.
James Lewis and Martin Fowler from ThoughtWorks offer a definition of the concept: “In short, the microservice architectural style is an approach to developing a single application as a suite of small services, each running in its own process and communicating with lightweight mechanisms, often an HTTP resource API. These services are built around business capabilities and are independently deployable by fully automated deployment machinery. There is a bare minimum of centralized management of these services, which may be written in different programming languages and use different data storage technologies."
In contrast, monolithic applications are built as a single unit. It consists of the client-side user interface, a database, and a server-side application, which "handle(s) HTTP requests, execute domain logic, retrieve and update data from the database, and select and populate HTML views to be sent to the browser" (Lewis, Fowler). This server-side application is a single logical executable. Changes to the monolith would require rebuilding and re-deploying an entirely new application version.
To summarize, monolith systems are often too rigid, architecturally complex, and not created according to accepted standards. The pool of talent who can operate them is limited and expensive. Onboarding even the most seasoned developer takes months. Small changes to monolithic systems require significant time and effort, typically involving tremendous risk.
In the legacy architecture, there were several different systems in place, and each system was built for a specific purpose in a relatively monolithic approach. You can't consolidate a stack if every system has its own silo and its own setup. We want to have a target architecture where we really have a more modular setup, and also we can evolve over time. And that's why we chose to have an API-first approach, to have headless systems and combine them into one user experience.
Expensive software monolith disasters often appeared in technology news headlines since the turn of the century.
In 2000, while Michael Jordan was still holding on to his legendary NBA career, Nike combined their ERP, supply chain, and CRM systems into one giant system. They wanted to forecast the demand for their products better (incl. the best-selling Air Jordans). However, a software glitch, according to their VP of Global Operations and Technology, Roland Wolfram, cost the company a $100 million in sales loss and a 20% stock price decrease. A massive number of Air Jordans simply didn’t make it to the stores. The project took twice as long to complete and cost an additional $100 million more than planned.
Other recent monolith-system-related debacles include Lidl’s canceled $500 million dollar inventory management project in 2018. Both Best Buy and Groupon barely avoided disaster by shifting to a more decoupled system architecture. Best Buy had a monolithic, interwoven Oracle database at its core, hindering the deployment of fixes and features -- a tough spot to be in with competitors like Amazon and Walmart. Groupon’s frontend codebase was difficult to maintain, page loading times were slow, and new features took ages to deploy.
In contrast, companies like Netflix based their phenomenal growth on smart microservice architectures. In 2009, Netflix struggled to achieve sufficient availability and speed for its streaming services. Scaling to the massive number of subscribers it has now (ca. 150m in April 2019) was simply not imaginable. By moving to a cloud-based headless architecture, Netflix could build data centers in minutes and keep up with its user growth rate. Moreover, the new approach allowed the company to create a few dozen independent developer teams that could work on different sets of microservices within different timelines. The productivity and flexibility of development were massively increased.
The overall trend is that over 80% of organizations that currently do not have a headless architecture plan to do so in the next two years. And for a very good reason – 77% of organizations that use a headless architecture state that it gives them improved agility, allowing them to make changes quickly.
The universe of content management has been dominated by massive .NET, Java, Perl, and PHP-based systems since the dot-com bubble. Open-source heavyweights WordPress, Joomla, and Drupal have democratized the creation of simpler websites, making them accessible to non-tech users.
Traditional content management systems are monoliths focused on a web-first platform and attempting to back-fill support for emerging technology like smartphones and televisions - in short, they are rigid and inflexible. Adapting them for modern digital content channels, such as mobile, IoT, or AR, is impossible or requires significant effort. Even small technical changes lead to long implementation times.
Yet, terms like "monolith", "headless", and "microservices" are merely concepts until you fit them into a specific use case. When so many monolith solutions claim to be "composable", you'll eventually realize they're "MACH monoliths". Though monolithic architecture is widely used in enterprises, the only way to go is to rethink and iterate solutions around what you really need.
A software glitch cost Nike $100 million in sales loss and a 20% stock price decrease
The engineers at Amazon Prime Video reported earlier this year that they had changed the architecture of their QoS (quality-of-service) monitor from microservices to a monolithic architecture, only to be found later by experts that the solution Prime Video adopted failed to meet the requirements of a monolithic application. In every respect that truly matters, including scalability and functionality, it is a more developed microservice than what Prime Video had before.
Perhaps the answer lies in what AWS’ Ajay Nair said: “Building an evolvable architectural software system is a strategy, not a religion.” After all, it's not enough to just adopt a solution because its term is trending. It's important to see if your current solution, whether that's the traditional monolithic, is holding you back, and here are some top signs to look out for:
Monolithic CMSs are often built on a rigid architecture, making it challenging to adapt to changing business needs and emerging technologies.
The tightly integrated nature of monolithic CMSs poses security risks, as a single vulnerability can compromise the entire system.
The rigid architecture and complex development processes of monolithic CMSs can lead to longer development cycles, resulting in slower time-to-market for new content and features.
As businesses grow and their content requirements expand, monolithic CMSs may struggle to handle the increasing workload efficiently.
Monolithic CMSs can be less SEO-friendly due to their restricted customization options, impacting search engine rankings and visibility.
Monolithic CMSs may require extensive resources and ongoing maintenance to keep the system up-to-date and secure. The costs associated with maintaining and upgrading the platform can strain an organization's budget and divert resources from other critical business initiatives.
Separating the frontend and backend of a content management system is the natural evolution of many of the monolith-related issues in this software category. Leave the CMS without a head and let the content be delivered to any modern stack via talkative APIs (e.g., GraphQL APIs), providing access to a powerful backend.
To elaborate, a headless CMS is, at its core, a content repository that makes content accessible via an API to any platform. The term "headless" comes from the concept of detaching the "Head," i.e., the frontend (Website, App, etc.), from the "body," i.e., the backend (content repository, database, etc.). Instead of delivering compiled HTML, a headless CMS only delivers the content by means of an API. An API-driven approach offers many advantages over traditional CMS paradigms.
By removing the presentation layer from the CMS, there are theoretically no restrictions to how and where content can be delivered. Marketing and editorial teams can create content within the editor interface of a headless CMS (similar to how they would with WordPress or Joomla) should there be one, and the engineering team can define how and where this content is delivered.
The headless approach to content management allows teams to publish content faster and iterate their digital presence more efficiently.
An API driven approach offers many advantages over traditional CMSs paradigms.
Bring content to any platform (native apps, VR, IoT, etc). You aren't restricted to just publishing content to a single website or mobile app. A headless CMS like Hygraph allows you to develop with any technology for any platform, making your product scalable when your users need you to be.
Working with clearly defined data lets your development team know where to pick up instantly. Hygraph content infrastructure clearly defines the operations (queries and mutations) supported by the API.
A headless CMS allows for your content to be modified immediately and as needed by your content creators. Minimize the impact of redesigns, product changes, and migrations with a decoupled content solution. Additionally, you don't need to worry that a headless CMS won't be able to deliver content to another digital channel that emerges five years from now.
With one point of connection, your headless CMS allows for only one access point of vulnerability. Hygraph offers many robust features for protecting your endpoint, including permanent auth tokens, DDOS mitigation strategies, and more.
You want to hire the most talented developers possible. There is no need to teach a prehistoric web template language just to manage your content. Instead, work with any modern language stack your team pleases.
It's counterintuitive to copy, paste & recreate content for your app across different platforms. Consolidating your content within one API minimizes overhead costs, time, and development resources.
By dividing the frontend presentation layer from the backend content administration and authoring layer, companies like Samsung, Dr. Oetker, and Booking have conquered many modern channels like web, mobile, and IoT. Frontend development teams no longer need to know the obscure secrets of a complex backend system.
Enterprises have widely adopted headless CMS for providing a seamless and omnichannel digital experience for customers. In the State of Commerce Report by Salesforce, 76% of companies state that headless CMS offers more flexibility in customizing digital experiences.
You want the customizability of an in-house CMS but not the associated costs and risks? A headless CMS can bring you close to this dream.
In theory, building your own CMS assures full customizability to your specific use case. In practice, a custom system is more likely to be a patchwork of compromises. It will result from internal struggles of prioritizing features, leaving everyone dissatisfied. It will fit your process at a specific time, but any later changes will require a rewrite of large parts of your codebase.
An un-opinionated headless solution like Hygraph fits the widest range of Content Modelling and API design needs. Frontend and backend are decoupled, so you can define and build all customer-facing features. Furthermore, features like UI Extensions and Custom Roles with granular access permissions enable you to adapt the CMS to even the most complex editorial processes.
You can set up an entire website in less than an hour with some headless commercial solutions including content architecture and API design and hooking up with your chosen frontend. Building an in-house system will set you back months, maybe years, of designing, building, and debugging.
Recommended reading
The total costs of an in-house CMS consist of large upfront and continuous ongoing maintenance costs. Upfront costs, measured in developer time, will set you back 18-48 developer months for the most basic CMS. Ongoing maintenance costs include hosting, a CDN, an authentication layer, developer tools, and some dedicated developer time for monitoring and bug fixing.
Headless CMS monthly costs start at free. Even the most demanding enterprise companies won’t spend more than a few thousand dollars for the highest service levels.
Switching costs to a new vendor are also significantly lower, thanks to the modular nature of a headless system. A native headless CMS, like Hygraph, is "unopinionated," allowing you to build your content infrastructure in a lego-building-blocks-like way. If you ever decide to move, you won´t need to build both your frontend and backend from scratch.
In best case scenario, an in-house solution will fulfill your requirements as long as those requirements do not change. If you never change your processes and never adopt new technology (e.g., smartphones or whatever comes next), this is okay. Probably, you will need to adapt to stay in business. So, you must adapt and expand your system in no later than 1-2 years. Once again, a new project team to brainstorm, innovate, build, test, deploy, and bug-fix.
A headless CMS company´s bread and butter is innovating. Upgrades will come regularly and at a much lower cost. Selecting a young company with a growth mindset means constantly exploring exciting new features for at least the next 5-7 years.
A complex solution like a headless CMS consists of multiple sub-systems that must coordinate perfectly. Many of these you don´t want to take care of yourself: server set-up, security layer, authentication layer, digital asset management, CDN setup.
Other subsystems need to be built by engineers with hard-to-find expertise: content model APIs, GraphQL server setup, workflow design, user role design, etc.
When choosing a headless CMS, organizations often find themselves at a crossroads, choosing between cloud-based CMS and on-premise CMS. It underscores the ongoing debate about CMS' efficiency, scalability, security, and cost-effectiveness.
A cloud-based CMS (or a cloud CMS), is a pre-built content management system hosted entirely on the cloud and can be accessed online by users without needing to install, update, or maintain any software on-premise.
It is typically licensed via subscription, and the cloud CMS provider offers constant software updates without disruptions. This allows organizations to focus on leveraging the many benefits of the CMS instead of drowning time and effort into managing and maintaining the CMS.
On-premises CMS is installed and run on an individual's computer or the organization’s server. When using an on-premise CMS, you are entirely responsible for managing the infrastructure needed to run the CMS.
On-premises solutions require installing new versions on the individual hardware to access the updated software, meaning that updates are usually bundled into bigger versions.
Now let’s get into the details and look at how cloud CMS and on-premise CMS are different with a side-by-side comparison:
| Category | Cloud CMS | On-premise CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Since cloud CMS is hosted on the cloud, it is immensely fast for publishing or editing content. Content editors save time as they don’t need to worry about how content appears on different platforms. Reusable components improve efficiency. | The speed of traditional CMS can be limited by on-premise infrastructure, available bandwidth, and existing hardware capabilities. |
| Collaboration | Enables real-time collaboration. Teams can edit, post, and iterate content seamlessly from anywhere and on any device. | Collaboration is limited to company intranet or approved devices, which can slow down workflows and delay content production. |
| Cost efficiency | Low upfront costs. Typically requires only subscription fees to get started. | Higher upfront costs for infrastructure, deployment, and maintenance. Ongoing IT resource costs must also be considered. |
| Scalability | Easily scalable up or down based on demand. Pay only for what you use. | Scaling requires additional servers, infrastructure, and manpower. Scaling down is difficult and less cost-effective. |
| Development time | Faster time to market. Often low-code, reducing IT dependency and allowing content teams to work independently. | Heavily dependent on in-house IT teams and coordination with content teams, which can slow development and delay time to market. |
While cloud-based CMS solutions offer many advantages, the choice between cloud and on-premise CMS should still consider factors like your organization's specific needs, security requirements, compliance considerations, and budget constraints. The decision often comes down to finding the right balance between convenience, flexibility, and control for your particular use case.
Nevertheless, a cloud-based CMS has the following advantages:
Scalability: Cloud-based CMS solutions can easily scale to accommodate increased traffic and content demands without significant hardware or infrastructure investments.
Cost-efficiency: With a cloud CMS, you can avoid the upfront costs of purchasing and maintaining on-premise hardware and software. Instead, you pay for what you use on a subscription basis, potentially reducing costs in the long run.
Accessibility: Cloud CMS platforms are accessible from anywhere with an internet connection, making it easier for distributed teams to collaborate and manage content.
Automatic updates: Cloud-based CMS providers typically handle software updates and maintenance, ensuring your system is always updated with the latest features and security patches.
Reliability: Cloud providers often offer high levels of redundancy and uptime, reducing the risk of downtime due to hardware failures.
Security: Reputable cloud providers invest heavily in security measures, often providing advanced security features that would be expensive and complex to implement in an on-premise environment.
Flexibility: Cloud-based CMS platforms often offer a range of integrations and APIs, making it easier to connect with other tools and services your organization uses.
Disaster recovery: Cloud providers typically have robust disaster recovery and backup solutions in place, reducing the risk of data loss.
Global reach: Cloud solutions can easily serve a global audience, ensuring fast and reliable access to your content for users worldwide.
Focus on core competencies: By offloading infrastructure management and maintenance to the cloud provider, your IT teams can focus on more strategic tasks and innovations rather than routine maintenance.
Despite the uprising popularity of headless systems, challenges exist, like developing and scaling headless systems with custom middleware. Composability and federation are two concepts widely discussed in the CMS space in recent years. We will examine the challenges that come with the rise of headless CMS. We will also examine what composability and federation mean for your business and whether they are necessary for you in this section.
The advent of headless CMS meant a crucial shift from traditional CMS models, allowing frontend developers a great degree of freedom in how they choose to present content. While this was a revolutionary development, it was becoming apparent that the frontend agnostic simply wasn't enough anymore.
Multiple headless CMS solutions tried to solve this problem by proactively pulling all the data in the CMS and calling it the Content Hub. You can, of course, push data to a CMS platform acting as the content repository, but you will always have to maintain the data syncing in between, and you will always run into data integrity problems as you begin to scale.
Once you work with millions of content items or several thousand items, maintaining this data synchronization becomes a real innovation bottleneck. Organizations should focus on delivering new capabilities to solve business challenges rather than losing time solving data integrity problems.
With the advent of composable architecture, businesses relying solely on headless systems might find themselves unable to efficiently customize their infrastructure, allocate resources dynamically, or scale effectively to meet fluctuating demands. In essence, a headless CMS can restrain adaptability and hinder an organization's ability to seize the full spectrum of benefits that a more modular, composable approach offers.
Gartner coined the term composable business in 2020 to describe the trend of companies moving away from traditional architectures, where technology is locked into one way of doing things, and towards a modular structure that lets businesses change and replace technologies and services as needed.
The idea quickly gained traction. Both are among technology leaders, with Gartner predicting that 70% of large and medium organizations will have composability as a key criterion for their new application planning by 2024. As well as among solution vendors, with Gartner predicting that the top 20 cloud platforms and software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers will offer composable component marketplaces by 2026.
The key principles of composable architecture include:
Discoverability: Team members should be able to easily identify and access components and any relevant documentation on how to use them.
Modularity: Each component should have a clear business identity. They should also be small enough to promote agility but large enough to operate independently.
Orchestration: Components should be able to interact with each other so that organizations can effectively build what is needed to support the business.
Autonomy: Each component should be self-contained so that it isn’t dependent on other parts of the system, thus making each easily changeable.
Composable architecture represents a natural progression from headless systems, aiming to address the growing demand for flexibility, scalability, resource optimization, and adaptability in a technology landscape characterized by dynamic workloads and ever-evolving applications. Composability is about breaking down IT infrastructure into smaller, interchangeable parts, providing organizations with a more agile and efficient way to manage and allocate resources. It offers a new level of granularity, control, and customization compared to the more predefined nature of headless architecture.
Regarding the CMS, the primary distinction between a headless CMS capable of supporting a composable architecture and one that cannot lies in its architectural flexibility and integration capabilities.
A headless CMS with composable support is designed with a modular, flexible structure, well-documented APIs, dynamic resource allocation, and customizable technology stacks, enabling organizations to create tailored, adaptable infrastructures seamlessly integrating diverse services and applications. In contrast, a headless CMS lacking composable support may have a more rigid, monolithic structure with limited customization options, restricted API functionality, and less efficient resource allocation, making it less suitable for organizations seeking a highly adaptable and scalable infrastructure.
Recommended reading
We at Hygraph firmly believe that Content Federation further unlocks content composability. Content Federation is the ability to bring data together from multiple sources and backends via API into a single repository without migrating the content or having multiple versions.
Content Federation allows businesses to pull data together from multiple sources and backends via API into a single repository. This can be done without migrating the content or having multiple versions.
Content federation provides access to up-to-date data across multiple systems. That data is then aggregated via a single API that serves as the source of truth and delivers the data to one or more frontends. Changes made to external data sources are updated and reflected in other systems. As a result, data integrity can be preserved and the most current information is always available.
Content Federation brings all your services together from a single GraphQL API, managed out of Hygraph. You can connect various data sources, such as headless e-commerce, PIM, or CRM systems, and join information across systems with a single API call to speed up your development process.
Recommended reading
Hygraph is the next-generation content management platform designed for the era of composable architecture. Hygraph makes it easy for businesses to orchestrate content across unlimited use cases, backend data sources, and frontend channels by providing:
Modern architecture: Leverage the flexibility of a natively headless SaaS platform that exposes all content and functionality via a powerful GraphQL API.
Content Federation: Join data from multiple sources using a single GraphQL API. Data lives in the original source, with Hygraph acting as an API gateway to provide access to always up-to-date information in one central place.
Flexible content modeling: Structure content to fit exact business needs. An intuitive Schema Builder makes it easy to create models, set fields, and define relationships between models.
Rich editing experience: Turn composable content into engaging experiences with an intuitive user interface that provides versioning, preview, digital asset management, and more.
Friction-free collaboration: Unlock the operational efficiency of your team with flexible workflows, roles & permissions, and localization capabilities for global business.
Hygraph is the first GraphQL-native Headless Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to rapidly build and deliver tomorrow’s multi-channel digital experiences at scale.
It was designed for removing traditional content management pain points by using the power of GraphQL, and take the idea of a Headless CMS to the next level. Hygraph integrates with any frontend technology, such as React, Vue and Svelte.
Get started with Hygraph by creating a free account, learn how our customers are solving real-world problems, gather information about next-generation CMS from our resources or academy, or learn more about the applications of Hygraph.
To discuss how Hygraph can help you transform your digital projects, reach out to us.