In recent years, microservices architecture and Jamstack have become increasingly popular among developers. These technologies offer great power and flexibility, enabling developers to create complex and sophisticated applications easily. However, as the number of services within an application grows, managing and unifying data can become increasingly challenging. This is because each service operates independently, often with its own data structures, making it difficult to ensure that all data is consistent and up-to-date.
To address this challenge, recoupling the data while maintaining a decoupled architecture is important. There are multiple patterns to accomplish this, all falling under a new buzzword: Federation. In this article, we'll explore the pros and cons of each style of federation and how to get started with a new set of superpowers to drive your development forward.
#The problem with decoupled data
Large enterprises can have dozens of CMSs or Information Systems, each operating autonomously and often disconnected from individual content teams, developers, and business leaders who use a different system within the same organization. This can lead to a lack of consistency and coordination across the organization, making it challenging to ensure that all data is up-to-date and accurate.
#The solution: recouple the data with federation
To address this challenge, recoupling the data while maintaining a decoupled architecture is important. Federation is a powerful tool that allows combining data from multiple datasets and services while keeping the autonomy of those services. Its core purpose is to provide end-users a single API to access all the content within an organization. Federation can read content or metadata in another repository while also being able to update metadata in the original source repository.
#Benefits and advantages of federation
Reduce or eliminate duplication of effort
One of the main benefits of federation is that it reduces or even eliminates duplication of effort. This means that organizations can save time and resources on data management tasks, freeing up more time and resources for other important business activities.
Improved accuracy
With all data remaining in the original location, businesses can ensure that their data is up-to-date and accurate. This not only helps to improve overall data quality but also helps to reduce the risk of errors and inconsistencies.
Increased efficiency
Content teams can access all the information they need from a single location. This reduces the amount of time spent searching for information, enabling organizations to be more productive and get more done in less time.
Greater flexibility
New sources of data can be easily added to the content stack, and existing ones can be updated or removed as needed. This helps businesses to stay agile and adapt to changing market conditions and customer needs.
#Challenges federation seeks to solve
Data inconsistency
One of the biggest challenges is data inconsistency. When data is stored in multiple locations, it can be difficult to ensure that all data is consistent and up-to-date.
Complexity in implementation
The process of federation can be quite time-consuming and may require a significant amount of resources. While a project with only a single API may not need a federation technique, the complexity that comes with enterprise-level decoupled architectures means that the middleware services you have to write to maintain that architecture scale up dramatically.
#Overcoming challenges with federation tools
Many federation tools are available, including service-level and platform-level federation, custom middleware, and frontend stitching into a unified source or API. Organizations can overcome the challenges of decoupled data and unlock the full power of Content Federation by choosing the right federation method for their use case.
Self-managed federation
One way to implement Content Federation is through self-managed federation. This method involves using open-source libraries like Apollo Server and Federation to host your own API and Federation layer. This approach provides full custom control over the code but requires all the code, maintenance, and hosting to be managed by the organization.
Self-managed federation is a good option for organizations with specific requirements that cannot be met using existing services or platforms. It allows for complete customization and control over the Content Federation process. However, it is important to note that this approach can be more time-consuming and resource-intensive than other federation techniques.
Ultimately, the decision to use self-managed federation will depend on the specific needs and resources of the organization.
Service-level federation
Another way to implement Content Federation is through service-level federation. This method involves using API services like Apollo or Tyk.io to create a federation layer. With service-level federation, organizations have a lot of control over the code without needing to maintain or host the API beyond the customizations they want.
Service-level federation is a great option for organizations that want more control over the federation process but don't want to manage the entire process themselves. This approach can also be less resource-intensive than self-managed federation, making it a more scalable option for larger organizations.
However, it's important to note that service-level federation may offer less control than self-managed federation. Organizations may also need to pay for the use of these API services, which can be a drawback for some.
Ultimately, the decision to use service-level federation will depend on the specific needs and resources of the organization.
Platform-level federation
Platform-level federation is another way to implement Content Federation. With this approach, hosts are getting into Federation with products like Netlify Connect. Platform-level federation provides simple data unification, making it great for frontend developers who don’t care how the data is unified. However, this approach also offers lower customization options and may lead to vendor lock-in.
Platform-level federation is a good option for organizations that want a simple way to unify their data without needing to spend a lot of time or resources managing the process. This approach is also great for organizations already using a hosting platform and wanting to keep everything in one place.
However, it's important to note that platform-level federation may not offer the same level of customization as self-managed or service-level federation. Additionally, organizations may be limited by the hosting platform's capabilities, which can make it challenging to use other federation techniques in the future.
Ultimately, the decision to use platform-level federation will depend on the specific needs and resources of the organization.
Content Federation
Content Federation is a powerful approach to managing data in a decoupled architecture. It involves using the CMS as the federation platform to create a unified API for developers and allow content editors to edit data from any place in the data stack.
One of the main benefits of Content Federation is that it reduces or eliminates duplication of effort. This means that organizations can save time and resources on data management tasks, freeing up more time and resources for other important business activities.
Another advantage of Content Federation is its ability to improve accuracy. All data remains in the original location; businesses can ensure that their data is up-to-date and accurate. This not only helps to improve overall data quality but also helps to reduce the risk of errors and inconsistencies.
Content teams can access all the information they need from a single location, reducing the amount of time spent searching for information enabling organizations to be more productive and get more done in less time. New data sources can also be easily added to the content stack, and existing ones can be updated or removed as needed, helping businesses stay agile and adapt to changing market conditions and customer needs.
However, there are also some drawbacks to using Content Federation. One of the biggest challenges is data inconsistency. When data is stored in multiple locations, it can be difficult to ensure that all data is consistent and up-to-date. Additionally, implementing Content Federation can require significant time and resources.
Despite these challenges, Content Federation is a great option for organizations with even a single editor for their content and data. It provides a unified API for developers and allows content editors to edit data from any place in the data stack. This reduces duplication of effort, improves accuracy, and increases efficiency, helping organizations to be more productive and get more done in less time.
Choosing the right federation method for your use case is crucial in overcoming the challenges of decoupled data and unlocking the full power of Content Federation. Organizations can leverage the power of Content Federation to streamline their data management processes, improve productivity, and ultimately achieve greater success.
Content federation is an ideal solution when you need to:
- Empower editors and developers
- Create a CMS that can help reinforce collaboration by breaking down content silos
- Increase content visibility across the organization and reduce duplication of effort
#Conclusion
Federation is a powerful tool to overcome the challenges of decoupled data. A centralized location to access all the content within an organization, Content Federation can help businesses save time and resources, improve accuracy, increase efficiency, and stay agile and adaptable in an ever-changing business landscape. Organizations can leverage the power of Content Federation to streamline their data management processes, improve productivity, and ultimately achieve greater success.
Blog Author