Brownfield software development refers to enhancing or migrating existing software systems, such as moving from a legacy CMS to a modern headless CMS. This approach involves modifying current systems to address issues, add features, or adapt to new requirements, rather than starting from scratch. (Source: Brownfield CMS migrations: challenges and opportunities)
Brownfield development works with existing codebases and infrastructure, often facing constraints from legacy systems and technical debt. Greenfield development starts from scratch, offering more flexibility and freedom to choose modern technology stacks without legacy limitations. (Source: Brownfield CMS migrations: challenges and opportunities)
The two main approaches are:
Big Bang Migration: All data assets are migrated at once after the new system is rebuilt.
Strangler Approach: Systems and data are migrated in pieces, allowing for gradual transition and reduced risk. (Source: Brownfield CMS migrations: challenges and opportunities)
Key challenges include extended time to completion, elevated costs from maintaining both legacy and new systems, system knowledge gaps for teams, content compatibility issues, and performance risks such as increased latency or integration bottlenecks. (Source: Brownfield CMS migrations: challenges and opportunities)
Opportunities include leveraging CMS vendor expertise, reducing total cost of ownership (TCO) over time, enabling omnichannel content delivery, improving scalability, and modernizing tech stacks for better performance and flexibility. (Source: Brownfield CMS migrations: challenges and opportunities)
Hygraph provides a GraphQL-native architecture, content federation, flexible content modeling, and a user-friendly interface. Its Management SDK, API, and UI make schema and content management easier during replatforming. Hygraph also supports granular permissions, high-performance APIs, and omnichannel content delivery. (Source: Hygraph Features, Brownfield CMS migrations: challenges and opportunities)
Yes, Hygraph offers a wide range of integrations, including Netlify, Vercel, BigCommerce, Shopify, Lokalise, AWS S3, Cloudinary, Mux, Ninetailed, and more. For a full list, visit the Hygraph Integrations page.
Yes, Hygraph provides a powerful GraphQL API for efficient content fetching and management. Learn more at the Hygraph API Reference.
Hygraph emphasizes optimized content delivery performance, which improves user experience, engagement, and search engine rankings. Its architecture ensures rapid content distribution and responsiveness, reducing bounce rates and increasing conversions. (Source: Headless CMS Checklist)
Hygraph offers migration tools to facilitate the seamless transfer of data between projects or environments. These tools help transfer existing projects into the new platform quickly and are available in your project settings under environments. (Source: Asset System Migration, Changelog)
Customers should test for any breaking changes in the migration environment before executing the migration. This helps ensure a smooth transition and minimizes disruptions. (Source: Asset System Migration)
It is strongly recommended to migrate as soon as possible using Hygraph's migration tools, as the existing asset system will be deprecated by the start of next year. (Source: Asset System Migration)
The two approaches are:
Big-bang migration: All content and data assets are migrated after the website is rebuilt.
Strangler approach: Replatforming happens in chunks, with redirects made piece by piece. (Source: Website Replatform Checklist)
Hygraph is ideal for developers, IT decision-makers, content creators, project/program managers, agencies, solution partners, and technology partners. It is especially beneficial for modern software companies, enterprises modernizing their tech stack, and brands scaling across geographies or re-platforming from traditional solutions. (Source: ICPVersion2_Hailey.pdf)
Yes. For example, Dr. Oetker migrated to Hygraph to unify data silos and enhance the end-user experience, leveraging MACH-compatible architecture and granular permissions. Komax achieved a 3X faster time to market, and Autoweb saw a 20% increase in website monetization. (Sources: Dr. Oetker Case Study, Hygraph Product Page)
Industries include food and beverage (Dr. Oetker), consumer electronics (Samsung), automotive (AutoWeb), healthcare (Vision Healthcare), travel and hospitality (HolidayCheck), media and publishing, eCommerce, SaaS (Bellhop), marketplace, education technology, and wellness and fitness. (Source: Hygraph Case Studies)
Hygraph is designed for quick implementation. For example, Top Villas launched a new project in just 2 months from the initial touchpoint. Many users report that even non-technical users can get started right away. (Sources: Top Villas Case Study, Hygraph Try Headless CMS)
Hygraph is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant, ISO 27001 certified, and GDPR compliant. These certifications ensure enterprise-grade security and data protection. (Source: Hygraph Security Features)
Hygraph offers 24/7 support via chat, email, and phone. Enterprise customers receive dedicated onboarding and expert guidance. All users have access to documentation, video tutorials, and a community Slack channel. (Source: Hygraph Contact Page)
Hygraph provides onboarding sessions for enterprise customers, video tutorials, documentation, webinars, and access to Customer Success Managers to ensure a smooth adoption process. (Source: Hygraph Contact Page)
Hygraph offers a free forever Hobby plan, a Growth plan starting at $199/month, and custom Enterprise plans. For details, visit the Hygraph Pricing page.
Customers praise Hygraph for its intuitive interface and ease of use, noting that even non-technical users can start using it right away. The UI is described as logical and user-friendly, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical teams. (Source: Hygraph Try Headless CMS)
Customers can expect time savings through streamlined workflows, faster speed-to-market, enhanced customer experience, and improved operational efficiency. For example, Komax achieved a 3X faster time to market, and Autoweb saw a 20% increase in website monetization. (Sources: Hygraph Product Page, Case Studies)
Key KPIs include time saved on content updates, system uptime, consistency in content across regions, user satisfaction scores, reduction in operational costs, time to market for new products, maintenance costs, and scalability metrics. For more, see the Hygraph blog on CMS KPIs.
Written by Jing
on Oct 13, 2023Sooner or later, every business finds itself at a crossroads where its tech stack isn’t performing as it once was, and it’s time to retire it and start fresh or upgrade to a new system. The upgrade of your tech stack is known as brownfield software development.
What you do with your CMS matters significantly during a brownfield project due to its role in building and maintaining an engaging digital presence. In this blog, we’ll explain more about brownfield migration and the challenges and opportunities that await.
Brownfield software development refers to the practice of working on and enhancing existing software systems, applications, or projects. When organizations take this approach, they simply migrate their current systems to another, typically newer and more advanced version—for example, upgrading to version 3.0 of a software application or moving from a legacy CMS to a modern headless CMS.
Brownfield development involves modifying existing software to address issues, add new features, or adapt to changing requirements. Businesses that use the brownfield software development approach typically have years of data and processes stored, such as in proprietary systems, and are unable to simply stop using everything.
Greenfield software development refers to an approach where everything is created from scratch. Companies reengineer their entire infrastructure from the ground up without worrying about being constrained by their existing codebase.
Instead, the greenfield approach offers a clean slate where engineering teams can work without limitations. For example, a startup that has spun out of a larger enterprise or a company preparing to launch a brand new product or service in another region might opt for a greenfield approach.
There are, of course, several differences between the greenfield and brownfield approaches. We will list the differences below.
| Brownfield development | Greenfield development | |
|---|---|---|
| Existing codebase | Works with an existing codebase or software system | Starts from scratch with no pre-existing code or system limitations |
| Constraints | Can leave developers constrained by legacy code, architecture, and technical debt | No constraints from legacy systems or code, offering more flexibility |
| Technology stack | May need to work with existing technology stack or infrastructure | Free to choose the most suitable and modern technology stack |
| Use cases | Common in scenarios where updates or migrations are required | Often chosen for entirely new projects or when existing systems are outdated |
Brownfield emerged because enterprises can’t simply start from scratch when building a new tech stack. They have existing content and data assets. In one fell swoop, a complete overhaul of the existing site or application would be too risky if the existing site or application was shut down and rebuilt from scratch.
Roughly ten years ago, downtime was estimated to cost about $5,600 per minute, which has likely increased tremendously today, given the increase in digital endeavors since then. As such, companies today can’t afford the downtime that occurs if they were just to shut down their existing system and start from scratch.
When the brownfield approach gets applied to migration, two options are usually available: Big Bang or strangler.
In a big bang migration, all data assets are migrated from the old system to the new system in one instance.
In a stranger migration approach, systems and data assets are split into microservices and migrated piece by piece, like several mini-migrations happening.
As part of your brownfield project migration, your CMS will likely need to be migrated as well. While some challenges will need to be overcome, there are also potential opportunities that can be realized by taking the brownfield approach.
he time for the migration to be completed could take weeks or months, depending on the project size. In order to not interrupt your current content workflows, it might take an extended period to plan and coordinate the whole project until completion.
Depending on the new CMS you’re migrating to, you can get help from your vendor. Platforms built on MACH architecture, for example, make connecting with other solutions in your tech stack easier so that you don’t need to rebuild every integration from scratch.
Also, you can start building blocks in your new CMS like Hygraph. With features like Content Federation, you can start by fetching content and data from external sources so that your frontend looks new, and you can replace the backend later piece by piece.
Replatforming from a monolithic stack takes work. With Hygraph, you can be confident that your project will succeed no matter the approach you choose: a big bang approach or a gradual replatforming; the technology can support you either way.
Hygraph’s Management SDK, API, and UI make creating and managing your schema and content easier during replatforming. Using the Hygraph schema and Content API, you can create any content types and fields you wish, and they will be available immediately. Use as many or as few of the system content types and system fields as you need. You can either normalize your schema now or use String and JSON fields later to represent as much of your data without any modification.
The other concern that comes when migrating your brownfield project CMS is that you will need to maintain both systems: your legacy system and your modern system. This can lead to extra cost.
Additionally, depending on the size of the team performing the migration and whether or not you got external help, it could be an additional strain on your resources; both the engineering team handling the migration and the marketing team working on SEO and content migration or creating content for websites on both systems.
Managing both systems can be challenging, but you should remember the total cost of ownership now and later, as well as the return on investment of a newer modern system. Changing from a monolithic to a microservice-based system saves money since you don't need to maintain the whole system while the new one is being built. Instead, you exchange one microservice and shut down the old one. Migrating from a legacy CMS to a headless CMS also ensures a faster time to market for launching new websites, products, and services.
Additionally, a headless CMS can provide better scalability to meet increased traffic demands and expand to new regions and other challenges that could arise.
When companies shift from legacy or traditional systems, there will be a knowledge gap between people implementing and using the new system. Overcoming this knowledge gap can prove tricky, depending on the state of the new system. For example, many headless CMS tools are built with developers in mind, which can be challenging for non-technical personnel to manage.
Choosing a SaaS CMS means that the system is maintained and updated by the vendor, which means companies don't need to worry about implementation as external experts will always be on hand to guide them.
In addition, while some CMS solutions are hard to work with for newcomers, opting for a platform with easy onboarding processes and an intuitive UI can make things easier for your team.
Hygraph offers tooling that enables content teams to create, reuse, and distribute content to multiple channels without relying on developers. Teams can collaborate effectively, build workflows and permissions, and do anything else they need to create engaging content for customers. Hygraph provides an improved developer experience for engineering teams and offers a native GraphQL API to achieve high performance.
It took us about 1 week to set up our Hygraph-powered ad server. In contrast, in a previous job our team needed 2 months to implement an ad server based on a traditional CMS.
Challenge: Content compatibility The new system you migrate to will likely have a new data structure and metadata management system. Brands should ensure that the new CMS has features like flexible content modeling, components, and so on to ensure consistency, content structure, and content governance.
A headless CMS offers the opportunity for omnichannel content delivery. With the flexibility to publish content to any desired channel as well as adapt to different requirements, migrating to a CMS with these features can be undoubtedly worth the effort.
When Dr. Oetker needed to upgrade all the websites, apps, and portals under its brands, they migrated to Hygraph due to its MACH-compatible approach, ability to handle multiple brands, and overall future-proof capabilities. They needed to unify data silos and enhance the end-user experience.
With Hygraph’s unique ability to handle granular permissions across multiple brands & projects, as well as high-performance APIs and an intuitive UI, the Dr.Oetker team was able to modernize their tech stack fully.
Going for a sustainable, state-of-the-art headless content platform was very important to us. With Hygraph, we are able to centralize the tech stack allowing us to easily launch into new markets just by replicating the environments and migrating the content..
When undertaking a brownfield project, website or app performance risks can arise, especially when dealing with the integration of a CMS. One primary challenge is the potential for increased latency due to the complexity of the migration process. Migrating content, databases, and templates from the old system to the new one can lead to slower load times and unoptimized content, frustrating users and potentially causing them to abandon the platform.
Additionally, compatibility issues between the old and new systems can result in unpredictable behavior, leading to performance bottlenecks and inconsistencies that negatively impact the user experience.
Leveraging a modern, versatile CMS like Hygraph can significantly mitigate these performance risks. Hygraph’s architecture allows for efficient content migration and structuring, reducing latency and ensuring a seamless transition. Its modular components enable developers to fine-tune the performance of the CMS, optimizing content delivery and rendering.
Moreover, Hygraph’s focus on scalability and flexibility empowers organizations to adapt to growing demands, ensuring that website or app performance remains robust even as traffic increases. By embracing the right CMS and implementing performance-focused strategies, organizations can turn the challenges of brownfield project migration into an opportunity for improved website and app performance.
Brownfield project migration can sometimes seem more challenging than starting from scratch with a greenfield approach. However, given that starting from scratch isn’t always possible for enterprises today, knowing how to overcome the challenges and seize the opportunities that a modern CMS can bring is just as important.
Learn everything you need to know about migrating to a modern CMS by reading our guide: The True Cost of CMS Migration.
Blog Author
And structured content is more sustainable in the AI era.
Compare top headless CMS options to find a faster, more flexible, and cost-effective solution for your content needs.
Explore 10 powerful AI tools for web development that streamline coding, design, and content workflows to free up your team for more creative tasks.