Our top 12 Static Site Generator (SSG) Picks for 2026

Hygraph is no stranger to the vast ocean of Static Site Generators (SSGs). These tools promise speed, both in development and performance, scalability, and stability. From React, to Vue, to Ruby on the Rails, every community seems to have at least one SSG to match.

In fact, staticgen.com lists hundreds. So we decided to compile a list of some of the top players in the SSG sphere and the players that are making strides to join the heavyweights.

#1. Next.JS

In 2026, Next.JS provides a full-stack delivery model that you can use to prerender pages, regenerate them incrementally, stream UI, and push rendering to the edge when you need it.

Why is this important? Because this way, marketing pages can be static and fast, content can be updated via ISR, and app-like sections can stay dynamic without switching stacks.

As a result, you get strong SEO readiness (due to pre-rendered HTML), solid Core Web Vitals potential, and scaling capabilities.

On the developer side, Next offers file-based routing, outstanding data fetching patterns, and image optimization, while mature docs make it easier to ship and maintain.

Where Next.js truly shines is its natural fit with headless CMSs, especially in the case of content-heavy sites. Pairing Next.js with a GraphQL-native headless CMS like Hygraph becomes an especially powerful stack that enables structured content, real-time previews, and omnichannel delivery.

Deployed on Vercel, a cloud platform for static sites, which provides support for Next.js deployments, the entire stack benefits from first-class Next.js support, edge caching, and seamless CI/CD.

To get an understanding of how NextJS, Hygraph, and Vercel work together, take this blog example for a spin, or view our Examples repo to work with Hygraph as a NextJS Headless CMS.

#2. Hugo

Hugo has earned its reputation as one of the fastest static site generators. Written in Go, it boasts blinding-fast build performance that lets you regenerate entire sites in milliseconds. This makes Hugo a top choice for content-heavy sites. Even the Kubernetes docs site uses Hugo to juggle thousands of pages without missing a beat.

Modern static generation is where Hugo shines. You can write in Markdown, and Hugo’s engine instantly outputs static HTML, with no need for runtime servers.

It’s also a win-win for SEO since pages are pre-rendered and load instantly, giving them great Core Web Vitals by default.

Despite its speed, Hugo doesn’t skimp on features. It offers an extensive theming system, shortcodes for dynamic content, built-in image processing, and i18n support out of the box.

You can even connect a headless CMS via content APIs or Git workflows. In many use cases, CMS content is hooked into Hugo’s build process for an efficient editor experience.

Although there are no plugins, with Hugo’s rich standard library, you will rarely need one.

Developers appreciate Hugo for its stable and mature experience, which makes it easy to scale from personal blogs to enterprise sites. As one user put it, with Hugo there’s “no bloated admin UI… just blazing-fast pages, full layout control, and Markdown in my workflow”.

#3. Astro

Astro offers a fresh take on static site generation - ship less JavaScript by default. Its islands architecture decouples content from interactivity, so pages render as lightweight HTML with zero JS unless needed.

As a result, you get ultra-fast loads and great SEO, which is a dream combo for content-rich sites and blogs. Astro can pull data from anywhere (Markdown, JSON, headless CMS APIs) at build time, and even include dynamic SSR or Edge Functions if you need them.

It’s a very flexible tool: you can mix-and-match React, Svelte, Vue, and other frameworks in Astro components, which makes adoption easy.

Performance is where Astro really shines, by shipping almost no JS to the client for static content, it delivers that instantaneous feel users love. Yet, it keeps a modern DX with hot reloading, an integrated dev server, and the ability to add interactivity via Astro Islands.

Early adopters have used Astro for everything from personal blogs to small business sites, often reporting that they “haven’t needed another framework” since switching.

According to the user community, Astro is very flexible, with a dynamic team that rolls out weekly updates.

With its rapid updates and growing community, Astro looks here to stay. We can even say it’s a hype-worthy framework that actually delivers on the hype.

#4. Bridgetown

Bridgetown is a modern Ruby-first Jekyll successor. It keeps what people loved about the “write Markdown, ship static” workflow, but updates the developer experience for today. This means more extensibility, a wider choice of plugins, and better alignment with modern frontend tools.

For headless CMS integration, Bridgetown is a good fit for build-time content ingestion. You can pull structured content from APIs and generate pages in a predictable, testable pipeline. That’s an ideal setup when you want full editorial ability without runtime fragility. Your editors can update content in a CMS, a webhook triggers a build, and you deploy static output.

The end product is static HTML, which can scale easily behind a CDN.

Where Bridgetown gets interesting is how it bridges “static” and “modern”. It brings component-ish patterns, a more contemporary build chain, and room to adopt AI tooling in the content pipeline without changing the site’s delivery model.

Bridgetown is also built for headless CMS workflows. You can fetch external data during the build by writing a short plugin (in Ruby) to pull in CMS content via APIs.

On the performance side, static Bridgetown sites are easy to deploy on CDNs for global speed, and the optional SSR is there for edge computing scenarios if needed.

#5. 11ty

Eleventy is often praised for being refreshingly simple and flexible, and offering a “do-whatever-you-want” experience in the static site generator world. You just organize content in folders (Markdown, HTML, or even data files), write templates in your language of choice (Nunjucks, Liquid, Handlebars, etc.), and Eleventy will build it into static HTML.

There’s no mandated framework or heavy client-side bundle. Eleventy only outputs what you yourself include. That means by default it ships zero JS, which is great for performance and SEO. On top of it, with Eleventy, it’s easy to start small and gradually scale up, which justifies its tagline “a simpler static site generator”.

Despite its minimal core, Eleventy can handle pretty sophisticated sites.

Need to integrate a headless CMS or API data?

Eleventy lets you pull in data and content at build time via its flexible data files or using Node scripts.

Developers love the freedom that comes with Eleventy. There’s no specific structure, so you can define your own workflow and use plugins or custom code as needed. It’s also very easy to adopt it in steps. You can even convert part of an existing site template-by-template without a full rebuild.

On the DX side, Eleventy takes a “bring your own stack,” approach, which seasoned web devs appreciate.

Users also praise Eleventy for having no “hidden magic” in it, but providing full control over what gets sent over at which point.

#6. SvelteKit

SvelteKit is more than just an SSG. It’s a full-fledged application framework for Svelte that you can use for static generation, server-side rendering, and everything in between.

If you just need a static site, SvelteKit can pre-render pages at build time (outputting pure HTML/CSS/JS) so you get the speed and SEO of static files. But if a project grows more dynamic, the same codebase can seamlessly switch to SSR or leverage edge functions via adapters (for platforms like Vercel, Cloudflare, etc.).

This flexibility makes SvelteKit a viable choice for projects that start as static content but may evolve into interactive apps.

In addition, it’s built on the super-fast Vite bundler, which provides a great dev experience with instant HMR and TypeScript support out of the box.

With SvelteKit, you can prerender routes and export static assets when you want a pure static build, or you mix in server rendering for sections that need it.

That “choose your mode” capability pairs nicely with headless CMS usage — it provides build-time content for stable pages, preview endpoints for editors, and dynamic routes when content is too large to fully precompute.

Developers love Svelte as a framework for its concise syntax and compiler magic that outputs highly efficient code. SvelteKit gets you all that, plus a straightforward file-based routing system and easy data loading via load functions.

#7. Nuxt.JS

Nuxt.js is a versatile SSG with a versatility that can scale from simple blogs to rich dynamic apps. Thanks to the recently matured Nuxt 3, built on the new Nitro engine, Nuxt.js is leaner and more performance-focused than ever.

You can use Nuxt.js for traditional static site generation (its nuxt generate command exports a fully static site you can deploy anywhere) or hybrid rendering, server routes, and edge deployments.

However, what sets Nuxt.js apart from the competition is its hybrid nature: for each page, you get to choose whether it’s pre-rendered, SSR, or even ISR (incremental re-gen) based.

For content-heavy sites, the Nuxt Content module is an awesome feature that turns Markdown files into a content API with search and tagging. With it, building a docs site or blog becomes a breeze.

Nuxt.js has a robust module system – everything from PWA support to image optimization can be plugged in easily.

Sentiment around Nuxt.js is mixed in a healthy way. While some users wish for a full stack debugging or at least on the frontend, others say there’s no better meta framework with a better DX available.

#8. Qwik

Qwik is a newcomer among the SSGs that has drawn attention with its radical approach to web performance that promises “instantaneous interactivity” with no hydration cost and no bloated bundles waking up on the client.

How does Qwik achieve this? It uses “resumability”, which means the HTML your users get is a fully interactive app state that the browser can pick up without re-running all the JavaScript.

This means Qwik sites display and become usable immediately, and then load any additional JS in small bits on demand. This architecture makes Qwik incredibly suited for static-generated sites where you still want rich interactions.

You can pre-render your pages (via Qwik City, the router/meta-framework) and deploy as static files. This way, users get fully-formed content for SEO, and Qwik will only load specific component logic if and when the user actually triggers it.

For developers, Qwik might feel a bit new — you write components with JSX/TSX and Qwik provides hooks similar to React’s, but with a twist that they can be serialized to HTML.

In practice, Qwik is a serious choice for teams that care deeply about shipped JavaScript and mobile performance.

#9. Zola

Zola is a Rust-based static site generator that has steadily gained a following for being both fast and simple. Much like Hugo, its Go counterpart, Zola is a single executable that can generate sites at staggering speeds. In fact, some benchmarks show it building sites even 4x faster than Hugo in certain cases.

A big part of Zola’s appeal, especially for developers, is that it “just works” out of the box. There’s no need to install a bunch of npm packages or deal with a Node toolchain. You write content in Markdown, use the friendly Tera templating language, and Zola churns out a static site.

The learning curve is gentle, especially for those coming from Jekyll or Liquid-based systems, as Tera is considered easier to pick up than Hugo’s Go templates.

Still, despite being simple, Zola is quite capable. It has built-in features like taxonomy (tags/categories), pagination, RSS feeds, and even built-in search index generation, so you can add client-side search without external services.

While it doesn’t have a plugin ecosystem, many users find Zola flexible enough through shortcodes and templates to do what they need. You can also integrate with headless CMS or other data sources by generating content files or using API scripts as part of your build pipeline.

However, while acknowledging its speed, some users still prefer Hugo over Zola for more complex projects that require collaboration or handovers.

#10. Docusaurus

Docusaurus is the go-to static site generator for documentation websites. Backed by Meta originally, it’s built on React and optimized for creating documentation, developer portals, and knowledge bases with minimal fuss.

What sets Docusaurus apart is how much it delivers out-of-the-box for docs sites. It has a polished default theme, automatic navigation structure, versioning support, full-text search, and even a built-in blog if you need one.

In other words, Docusaurus lets you focus on your content while it handles the infrastructure. You write docs in Markdown, and Docusaurus generates a static SPA that feels super snappy for users thanks to client-side routing.

However, it still outputs prerendered HTML for each page, so SEO is covered, and users see content immediately.

Developers often praise Docusaurus for being straightforward and having a great DX. You don’t need to be a React expert to use it, but if you are, the theming and customization via React components is extremely powerful.

Many companies choose Docusaurus because it scales easily. It has built-in multi-version docs for multiple product releases. If you need a custom design, you can extend or override any part of the React theme.

Docusaurus also plays nicely with headless CMS workflows: some teams author in Git (Markdown/MDX), while others integrate CMS content into the build pipeline for editorial teams.

#11. Hexo

Hexo is a veteran of the static site generator world that stays relevant in 2026 mainly for its no-nonsense approach. Powered by Node.js, Hexo is an ideal choice for JavaScript developers who want to write blogs in Markdown and deploy to services like GitHub Pages.

Thanks to its minimal core, Hexo is fast and lightweight, able to generate pages quickly even for large blogs. The latest version hasn’t changed its winning formula much — You run hexo init to scaffold a site, write posts in Markdown, and Hexo generates a static site for you.

There’s a theming system and a rich plugin ecosystem you can use to add features or integrate with things like tag clouds, SEO tags, or sitemaps. If you need to pull content from a headless CMS or external source, you might use a plugin or a small script, but generally, Hexo sites tend to be self-contained with Markdown files for content.

Hexo really shines in the blogging use-case. It offers categories, tags, excerpts, and other blog-oriented features out of the box. Plus, there are tons of community themes, many of them with that clean, minimal developer-blog aesthetic.

Although there’s a community sentiment that it’s been lagging in speed, especially compared to Hugo or Zola, Hexo is still a fantastic option in 2026, especially for personal blogs and small to medium-sized sites. The ecosystem and community remain its advantages.

#12. MkDocs

MkDocs is a lightweight static site generator with a focus on project documentation. Written in Python and using the “docs-as-code” philosophy, it allows you to write your docs in plain Markdown, organize them with a simple YAML config, and generate a searchable, mobile-friendly site with one command.

What users love about MkDocs is that it does one thing —documentation sites — and does it really well. Actually, it’s the engine behind countless documentation portals and is often paired with the popular Material for MkDocs theme, which gives you a beautiful out-of-the-box design.

The workflow with MkDocs is ideal for developers: you store docs in a Git repo, maybe alongside your code, and every time you push updates, your CI can run mkdocs build to deploy updated docs.

Developer experience is often praised for being “what you see is what you get.” One team recently called adopting MkDocs + Material a game-changer for their workflow, as it allowed them to move from slow manual processes to a rapid Markdown-based setup.

They loved how it put content in Markdown, used GitHub for version control, and produced a “great looking documentation” with minimal effort.